Why the story of an obsessive superfan is even more potent three decades on

With Rob Reiner’s thriller celebrating its thirtieth anniversary, George Nash appears on the alarming relevance of Distress within the fashionable period…


Films, and maybe most patently horror films, are like mirrors. For properly over a century, within the acquainted setting of the lounge or darkish sanctuary of the multiplex, within the perceived security of escapism, the shifting image has mirrored the successes, sins and fears of society proper again at us. The horror style specifically, each a product of, and response to the trials and tribulations of the day, does so extra overtly than most, taking kinds that sway unashamedly between barrages of blood, brooding, slow-burning atmospheres, and drain-dwelling killer clowns with pink balloons.

What the perfect ones share, nonetheless, is a sense of agelessness. These are movies which might be scary in ways in which transcends each time and place, typically manifesting terrifying new meanings through the years whereas retaining an alarming relevance.

It’s, as an example, watching Ben, the African American hero from George A. Romero’s Night time of the Dwelling Lifeless, being gunned down within the movie’s last frames by white authorities in a time of Black Lives Matter protests. It’s watching Amity Island’s callous Mayor Vaughn refusing to close the seashores in Jaws throughout a world pandemic. And, three many years on, it’s watching Annie Wilkes, the obsessive superfan within the 1990 Rob Reiner adaptation of Stephen King’s novel Distress, holding famend novelist Paul Sheldon captive in her dwelling when the social media age has utterly redefined the connection between a celeb and their fan base.


“I’m your primary fan,” utters Wilkes (an Oscar-winning efficiency from then-unknown actress Kathy Bates) in what has grow to be the movie’s enduring, unofficial tagline. Becoming then, that it might be a second of unbridled fandom that may start the cinematic journey of King’s textual content.

“[King] didn’t wish to choice it to anyone, except he felt it was in good arms,” mentioned Reiner of the writer’s reluctance to supply up the film rights for his ebook on the Collector’s Version Blu-ray, launched in 2017. That hardly appears shocking: Distress was, and arguably stays, its writer’s most private work. In its examination of entrapment, each bodily and figurative, the story of a well-known author (performed by James Caan), professionally pigeonholed by a collection of common Harlequin-esque romance novels, being held captive by Bates’ obsessive fan attracts parallels with King’s personal struggles with drug habit and his makes an attempt to shake the confinement of his success in horror fiction.

But, so impressed by what Reiner had carried out with Stand By Me – an adaptation of his 1982 novella, The Physique – King was blissful to grant the rights to Fort Rock Leisure (the manufacturing firm whose title, by the way, was impressed by the fictional Maine city featured in a number of of King’s tales) on the situation that Reiner would both produce or direct.

For King, a minimum of, the choice proved fruitful: the writer has listed Distress amongst his all-time favorite movie variations. In 1990, nonetheless, it was one thing of an outlier throughout a very affluent interval for Hollywood films about (primarily feminine) stalkers. Deadly Attraction, launched in 1987, had grow to be an enormous hit, whereas potboilers like Poison Ivy and The Crush (each arriving within the early 90s) had been lurking simply across the nook. Sandwiched in between was Reiner’s movie, one which, regardless of the indubitable romantic undertones in Wilkes’s obsession with Sheldon, eschews the underlying erotica of its contemporaries in favour of one thing extra slippery, extra darkly humorous, and one thing altogether extra menacing.


However Distress, as a lot because it operates as a nasty, horror-tinged cautionary story about fandom, is at its best as a shrewd examination of the disparity between notion and actuality. Above all else, it’s most potent as a parable about followers and their idols: a relationship that exists not with an actual particular person, however with the general public persona of an individual.

“If you first got here right here, I solely liked the author a part of Paul Sheldon,” Wilkes says, “Now I do know I really like the remainder of him too.” Given the trail the movie finally takes, it’s a line that’s as ironic as it’s telling. Totally consumed by the picture of who she desires him to be, Wilkes flies off the proverbial deal with when Paul fails to satisfy her expectations, and subsequently takes a really literal sledgehammer to the true Sheldon she has been uncovered to.

However Wilkes is extra nuanced than the movie’s notorious ‘hobbling’ scene may recommend. Beneath a violent, unpredictable exterior, she is a personality of intriguing contradiction. She symbolises the whole lot from giddy adoration to unhealthy fixation, and the superb line that separates them. She is each caricature and sophisticated. Each excessive and alarmingly strange. She is each scary and pitiful. Each villain and sufferer. In one thing of an anomaly in mainstream horror, she is each different and us.


And, 30 years later, she has grow to be a moderately placing embodiment of at the moment’s on-line world. Regardless of predating the social media period by the very best a part of 20 years, Wilkes is the final word ‘stan’: an early, albeit exaggerated iteration of latest fan tradition, and viewers may properly see a bit little bit of themselves in her unabashed pleasure at getting up shut and private along with her hero and her encyclopaedic data of even his most trivial idiosyncrasies. In 2020, nonetheless, it comes not as the results of a automobile crash within the snow-covered hills of rural Colorado, however on the easy contact of a button.

To that finish, watching Reiner’s movie at the moment, the rising claustrophobia of Sheldon’s predicament begins to tackle an added metaphorical layer. Simply because the bed-bound writer is on the mercy of Wilkes—diminished to one thing of a static determine, very similar to her prized porcelain animals, and confined throughout the 4 partitions of her distant cabin—the house between superstar and fan in up to date society has by no means been smaller. As the gap erodes with rising velocity in an age of social media, the adoring plenty now have larger, near-constant entry to their idols. Each standing, each uploaded photograph, and each 280-character message turns into an invite for followers to step that little bit additional into a celeb’s private life. And it could all be carried out from the consolation of dwelling.

However, because it does within the movie, issues can shortly flip ugly. Contemplate, for instance, the web backlash every time an actor, popstar or influencer begins to get political, or, extra particularly, the petition began by followers to take away Rian Johnson’s The Final Jedi from the Star Wars canon utterly—a motion that pulls eerie similarities to the actions of Wilkes upon studying the destiny of Distress Chastain, the titular character of Paul’s literary franchise.


In that sense, the movie’s opening body, a clean display screen accompanied by the sound of loud typing, turns into all of the extra salient. When Sheldon naively remarks to Wilkes early on “You had been following me,” in a time of Twitter and Instagram, it hits a bit in another way. Had been it made now, Distress may require nothing extra. There’d be no want for a automobile accident or a torched manuscript; no want for a hostage scenario or a pair of obliterated tibia. The lethal concoction of Distress Chastain’s loss of life and a social media account can be scary sufficient.

Maybe even Annie Wilkes and her cabin within the woods can be surplus to necessities. In 2020, it appears, your primary fan isn’t that far-off. Only a click on away, actually.

George Nash


Supply through www.flickeringmyth.com

Leave a Reply